Thursday, July 19, 2012

The Dumbing Down of America.


What is all this campaign rhetoric about outsourcing? 

To listen to the campaign rhetoric you would think this is the most egregious, anti American practice out there.  Listening to either camp, you would guess that the other is the evil mastermind, trying to destroy America through the export of jobs.  We all know that isn’t so, so why all the focus on this issue?
We have been hearing of late that the economy is not a winning issue in this election, that given the change of the social demographic, the state of the economy is just not enough to push the election over the top.  Why is that? Are things so much better than in 2008 and 2010?  Are people’s lives, their perspective of the potential for success so much improved? Has hope been restored?

I contend that, if indeed the economy is not a “winning issue” it is for the exact opposite reason. Hope has been lost. If the economy is not a winning issue, it is because the majority has been convinced that where we are, is the new norm.  That the rise in government dependence is the new economy. That success, individual effort, and enjoying the freedom achieved from the fruits of one’s own labor is now just a fantasy.  In short, that we are no longer America, the exceptional country, the “Land of Opportunity” that individuals have come from all parts of the earth to be a part of for the last 2 centuries. 

Listening to our President, we never were that country.  His rhetoric is that the principals that built this nation, the America that has stood as a witness to human ability, individual achievement, and entrepreneurship, have never worked.  I am sure from his perspective, it hasn’t but that is almost another discussion all together.  I say almost, because there is a common element to his perspective and to the citizenry that share his perspective.  Something has indeed changed in America, it threatens our very way of life and it is directly related to why we are in this quandary about outsourcing, why the economy is not a winning issue, and why hope is, in many corners, lost.

America was built on a foundation that was unique in the world.  It was formed with the idea that the individual had inherent worth and ability, potential that was untapped, that inherent in man was God given ability to achieve and excel l without the necessity of an overlord of government to rule him.  The principal of America was that men had the right to pursue happiness on their own terms in so far as it did not harm another’s freedom to do the same.  We believe that all men were created equal, that at our birth, man is inherently talented and he should have the opportunity to exercise his will to reach his potential.  This was the basis of the formation of our country.

So what has changed?  Why, now after 200+ years of amazing expansion, yes with some tough times along the way, are we reduced to a people who now increasingly desire to rely on government assistance, to accept what they have not earned without reservation, and in increasing numbers with desire and expectation?

I contend it is about education.  Depending on your view it may be the success or failure of our educational system, including the responsibility of parents at home, but it is about education.  For many years there has been an attempt to shift education from focus on individual success and liberty, to equality among the citizenry.  There has been an initiative to mitigate the value of individual achievement, for the idea of equality. In effect there has been a concerted effort to rewrite the principals of freedom and personal liberty that our country was founded on to shape our country more into the model of servitude that has been the basis of other governments around the world.

I hope at this point you are starting to get a sick, even angry feeling, whether it is toward me or those who have perpetuated this shift, it doesn’t matter.  The fact of the matter is that as a citizenry, we have been dumbed down so that a few can have power, we have been taught to conform, to give up freedom for perceived security, give up opportunity for comfort (even at a subsistence level), to forgo liberty in the name of equality.  It is a common social structure around the world, one that Communists, Socialists, Marxist, Leninists, even tyrannical dictatorships all hold in common as a way to control the citizenry.  They do it under different philosophical dogma but they all share the principal that the masses are only worthwhile when they are in the service of the authority.  It is what our founders fled from and sought to avoid in the foundation of our system of government.

Yet here we are, nearing a tipping point, some say we are already past.  We fight about menial issues while ignoring the fact that we are doing exactly what those who have moved us to this point would have us do.
Is it coincidence that as a developed nation, our citizenry understands less about their country’s actual history than any developed nation, that the principles of free enterprise, and capitalistic economics are demonized if taught at all? That we are prodded to despise those who have wealth and to regard them as selfish, thieves, and uncaring rather than celebrating their achievement and aspiring to attain the same?  Is it coincidence that no longer is a high school education is not regarded as adequate for entry into the workforce yet a college diploma also doesn’t ensure that an individual will even understand the basics of our capitalist economy?  Is it a coincidence that we are more and more led to believe that conformity is desired, that political correctness is better than questioning, that everything is a right regardless of whether it is a deviant behavior,  legal, moral, or constructive for our society?  Is it a coincidence that dependence is regarded as the most appropriate stimulus in the “new economy”?  But I digress.

What does all of this have to do with outsourcing?  If you have any understanding of business in a free economy, you understand that profit is only achieved as a business is able to be competitive and bring a product to market of equal or better quality, at a price equal to or less than your competitor.  You also understand that it is not the desire of any businessman to see his business slow in such a way that he must lay people off.  That is called contraction and is opposite of the goal of business seeking profit.  Growth is always the desired path in providing positive returns.  So why would anyone outsource?  Logically it should not be cheaper to do business at a distance; transportation alone should mitigate labor disparity.  But the sad fact is that it does not.   The same forces that have shifted our focus in education, also strive to “protect our health, save our planet, feed the world, save the spotted owl and every other insane and idiotic, special interest cause.  Don’t get me wrong, everyone wants to clean water, safe food, a preservation of and good stewardship of our earth, but we are a country of legal and regulatory road blocks that not only hamper our ability to do business competitively, it costs us as consumers at every corner.  Where ever you look now there are regulations meant to raise tax revenues, protect us from ourselves, and provide for mitigation of past injustices.  We are still the manufacturing force of the world, but every day it becomes more difficult, this year alone over 100,000 regulations touching on every aspect of our free enterprise system has been enacted.  Few are repealed, the new are just layered on and the bureaucracy of red tape continues to slow our progress.  Whether it is product production method regulation, labor safety requirements, employee benefits, use taxes, product liability funds, regulatory compliance issues, accountancy regulations, you name it, it has to be incorporated in to the cost of bringing product to market. We have become the highest taxed, most regulated economy on earth. 

If you are a business leader faced with the requirement of providing return on the risk investment of your shareholders (who ever they are: for public companies the shareholders may include people who have pensions, 401k accounts, money market accounts, and any savings account that provides interest, in short almost everyone whether a direct shareholder or as beneficiary as a result of having an account with an institution who holds your money and makes investments to provide you interest) you are, by duty, bound to find a way to return profit to your shareholders.  If you do not, you are not worth your salary.

The issue with outsourcing is not whether it is evil or not, it is, why is it necessary? What causes business to act in a manner that seems counter intuitive?  This would not be a difficult question to answer if even in our secondary education we taught basic principles of capitalism as we did 3 decades ago.  It would not be such a mystery to the average laborer, even to today’s college graduate if we taught a minimally acceptable level of fiscally responsible economic principle theory that is the basis of what has been the greatest wealth and prosperity generator for over two centuries.  It is not difficult to understand that regulation, restrictive use laws, taxation, and collective union bargaining without regard for the competitive climate of our global economy, when out of balance with the rest of the world, has pushed our business leaders to search beyond our borders for efficiency in bringing products to market.   

It is now so bad that even those who claim to despise the thought (as in our president) cannot avoid it.  Two thirds of all of our stimulus funds (your and my tax dollars) went to the benefit of foreign entities, whether by design or by nature of the beast, I will leave you to decide.  But the fact of the matter is, business expansion (which is job creation in this nation) under the capitalistic economy we enjoy is dependent on the regulatory and taxation environment that it is burdened with.  It is out of control!  You have no idea how much of the price you pay of every product is inflated by the overburden of our government.

Yes outsourcing occurs, but like so many of the drugs we have been dumbed into taking, discussing outsourcing is only like treating a symptom.  If you want to fix the disease you have to the source.  You have to attack the problem within.  It is time to stop masking symptoms (or making them the main focus of dialog in the presidential campaign), let’s get into the real issues.  Do we want to be the people we were meant to be as Americans?  Do we want freedom or dependence?  You can’t have it both ways.   Do we want a prosperous economy, a land of opportunity, or a subsistence economy of dependant citizens?  Do we want to be controllers of our own destiny or are we destining to fail and be servitude to the authority of the moment? 

Our founders intended for us to be the authority, the government was only meant to protect our freedom, why have we given up so much with hope for so little in return? 


Wednesday, July 18, 2012

With only 3 months left before the Election...what is the Campaign Focus?


Can I really be hearing this right?  What is it that our President wants to make the campaign about?  From all of the coverage in the news, you would think we would be deep into issues of extreme importance to the State of the Nation.  Let’s see, what is the campaign about?

Is it about those things that the Federal government is sworn to do for our nation? Things like:
-          
      The protection of our boarders?  No, the President has our border patrol shooting bean bags at assailants armed with automatic weapons, some from his own failed program. He refuses to send ICE to uphold the law in AZ, and promotes amnesty for Illegal aliens.

-          The taxation and regulation of foreign of business and government to prevent the intrusion of their power and ideology upon our citizenry?  No, he is a citizen of the world who believes in international law over national sovereignty.  He has demonstrated this regularly in his method of negotiation and communication, he has attempted to use sway in subversion over missile treaties (remember the caught off mic statement to Russia), favors the international arms treaty that is in direct opposition to our 2nd amendment, Supported Funding UN programs that directly fund abortion in China, supports international treaties on climate change that are proven to be about wealth transfer not the environment, even the “science” they were based on is false.

-          The efficient use of government to protect the tax resources of our citizenry?  No, never had an approved budget during his administration, he isn’t even supported in a budget by the democrat senate. Spent a trillion dollars on a failed stimulus, much of which went to donor paybacks, and international companies beyond our borders?


-         The protection of State’s Sovereignty and the limited powers of the federal government? No, he has shown he has little regard to limited government under the constitution and would rather sue states that try to protect themselves and their citizenry from illegal intrusion on the border or at the ballot box.

Is it about Transparency?  I seem to remember that was a big campaign thing for him last time.  Well I guess in a sense it is about that, when it comes to him speaking about his opponent at least.  Let’s not forget that Mr. Romney has done everything required by law.  It is just our presidents desire to deflect from himself in trying to make Romney’s tax returns an issue.  Who was it that has spent millions of dollars to hide his past?  Who had his records sealed?, who acts behind closed doors and goes around congress to make unconstitutional appointments and governs by executive order rather than rule of law?  Who is it that invokes 12th hour executive privilege to keep details of Fast and Furious from being disclosed after claiming that all had been released and there was nothing to hide?  Who was it that forced a unconstitutional health care bill through congress without even giving legislators the opportunity to read what was in it, all the while claiming it was not a tax and now we find out it is the largest tax ever imposed on the citizenry of the United states?  Well, no it is not about that type of transparency.

Is it about solid economic policy that will set our economy back on the path of prosperity for the citizens?  NO! It is not that because if you were a prosperous business, you didn't do it anyway, it was somebody else! 

No the presidential campaign at this point is not about any of these things according to our President, our “leader”.  As of today it is about whether or not Mr. Romney was or was not at Bain during time that we all know he was focused on the Utah Olympics, and weather decisions that we made by a private enterprise that Mr. Romney may or may not have had any influence over were appropriate.   Not whether they were legal, or whether they even served the interest of the shareholders.  Oh and by the way, what we do know, is that one of Obama’s campaign contribution bundlers, was at the head of Bain Capital when the decisions are being questioned were made. Oh the irony.

But when did what was done in a private business, with private funds, for the purposes of shareholder value, that were likely not even under the immediate control of the person in question, become the prime issues of the day for a presidential campaign?  Maybe when the President cannot run on anything else?  The very nature of the dialog from the white house campaign should give America pause.  Is this what we want form our President?  Is this helping America make a decision that is productive to moving our nation forward?

Are we a better informed, more cohesive, more nationally solid people because of the actions and dialog of our President, or is his campaign just more of the same that we have found in his failed presidency over the last 3 and a half years.  Is it more Chicago politics, distraction and division of the people, trying to divide and conquer, for powers sake, be damned the constitution, the will of the citizenry, free enterprise, and general liberty?

Well, regardless of what Romney did with his own money, time and energy as a private citizen. Which frankly I applaud, I guess you know where I stand. 

Maybe it’s time to think for yourself about what is important in this election.  Who will uphold the standard of liberty, the rule of law, and honor the oath of office which he will be sworn to. Our current President has not.  Please someone raise issues of real importance to our nation,  I really don’t care if somehow Romney’s Bain Capital was somehow parodied in the last Batman movie.  But form the White house surrogates you would think it is issue # 2.

Come on, enough distraction stop getting your news form John Stewart and the like, let’s have a real campaign, one of substance, or is that one over already?  I guess we do have the record of the President.